<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back in the Bay (but for real this time)</title>
	<link>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/</link>
	<description>Claire and Whit on Holiday</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: claire</title>
		<link>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>and what song would that be from spencer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what song would that be from spencer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I'm a big fan of obscure yet intriguing references.  So, like, pick a favorite movie or song, &#38; then pick a favorite line or lyric from that movie or song, &#38; then that's the name of the site.  To make an example up on the spot, I could name a site, say... 

THEY'RE NORWEGIAN, MAC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of obscure yet intriguing references.  So, like, pick a favorite movie or song, &amp; then pick a favorite line or lyric from that movie or song, &amp; then that&#8217;s the name of the site.  To make an example up on the spot, I could name a site, say&#8230; </p>
<p>THEY&#8217;RE NORWEGIAN, MAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure clairenwhit.com is not taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure clairenwhit.com is not taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke R</title>
		<link>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drewd.com/clairenwhit/2007/07/20/back-in-the-bay-but-for-real-this-time/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>heeelarious!  As difficult of a night as it may have been, the one great story!  Jetta would obviously be the better name for da kitty.  But I know they aren't taking votes (are they?).  

If you are gonna keep the blog going (and you better), a name change is definitly in order.  Here are my ideas:

Whaire.com (WHit + clAIR, and you are often talking about where you are) -- its available!   Combining the other way is not...  Uhhhh...  

Hm, I thought I had other ideas but i don't think I can do better  than that right now. I will keeep it in mind tho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heeelarious!  As difficult of a night as it may have been, the one great story!  Jetta would obviously be the better name for da kitty.  But I know they aren&#8217;t taking votes (are they?).  </p>
<p>If you are gonna keep the blog going (and you better), a name change is definitly in order.  Here are my ideas:</p>
<p>Whaire.com (WHit + clAIR, and you are often talking about where you are) &#8212; its available!   Combining the other way is not&#8230;  Uhhhh&#8230;  </p>
<p>Hm, I thought I had other ideas but i don&#8217;t think I can do better  than that right now. I will keeep it in mind tho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
